if...

if the world was 'destroyed', i wouldn't really care much...
and no, this is not me speaking satirically or in a negative way...
i am simply embracing a truth...
and when i say 'destroy the world', i don't mean complete obliteration of planet earth, but am talking more about the extermination of portions of the 'opposing' population...
therefore it's not really 'destroy' in the complete sense, but more 'destroy to make way for a new era of change'... (now i sound like a hitler-mao-darth vader devotee??? at least i am cute :-p)

basically if ppl want to go ahead and 'destroy the world as we know it', then its fine by me, "BUT"... only if they have an alternative plan in place that is significantly more beneficial than how the world already functions... and only then, would i agree to such condtions of annihilation!!! (hell if their manifesto was something that i would aim for, then i would even help out in achieving that goal!!! (hitler+mao+vader+timmy = 'hiaodemy'))

i mean, the 'moulding of humanity' can simply be compared to that of a 'contruction-project'...
buildings are demolished, and new buildings are put in to replace, and after a certain period of time no one will remember what was there before or question why such a change took place...
in other words, 'absolute-acceptance' has been instilled...

its not like its something new for us to think of, since it has happened before, and when i say before i mean before our very own history...
i am of course talking about the extinction of the dinosaurs that carved a path for the beginning & survival of the mammal species...
but, bringing us up to date, our very own timeline has seen this happen countless times over through 'warfare', where civilisations were conquered, and ultimately 'destroyed over time' by the integration of the victor's overruling cultural influences of customs and language and religion...

england itself is a living diagram of this, and would not have been what is is today if not for the roman empire, marauding vikings, french conquest and so forth...
if you don't believe me then you should examine the 'english language' itself...
i am pretty certain that you will find plenty of evidence to support such an accusation...
i mean, 'english language roots', are actually founded from an amalgamation of latinate terms, greek derivations, romanic-germanic borrowings, french synonyms and norse influences (rune alphabet during the anglo saxon times)...

another good example is to ask 'who is a pure american???', because speaking fact-based, america didn't exist until the latter end of the 1400's... and most americans, that we recognise today, are either the generations of ppl born from the 'first immigrant settlers' or ppl that are born on the soil of the land titled 'america'... on the subject of america, i have to also make you think about 'south america', and how cortez's spanish conquest not only changed the 'mother-tongue' of the inhabitants but also destroyed their entire way of life and nearly all the people (i.e. religious sacrifices were forbidden and foreign disease that they had no anti-bodies to fight against...)

and one last illustration to look at, would be, the success of emperor (..........) whose blood filled wars ensured that the 7 kingdoms were merged into one mighty country known as the 'middle-kingdom' ('zhong-guo' or 'china' to those that don't speak chinese :-p)...

okay, there was a point to that brief history lesson...
and the point is...
'we don't think about it anymore'...
as in, we don't ask the question, 'what would the world be like if so&so took place or if so&so didn't take place'...
(you're thinking about it now right??? :-p)

so, what i am trying to get at is, although 'changes' will take place in our time; and as a whole we become frustrasted by them, since everyone is always resilient to 'differences from how it has always been', it is still a 'change' that will only greatly affect 'the ppl of today'... and honestly speaking, if the 'generations to come' are just like us, they too 'will not think about how events in the past have shaped their future', and will also just 'accept' whatever has been documented in the history books...

whatever happens, happens, and as human beings we just have to learn to adapt to it as best we can...

its a terrible thing to write but its the truth...

for the ppl that are living in the 'birth of a new era', i understand it will all be daunting and frightening and no words could ever be words of comfort, because there is the constant worry of 'if such a change is for the better' or 'if such a change is for the worse'; and though i cannot see or predict mankinds future, the only thing that i can write is, 'whether or not a change is good or bad, depends entirely on how the victors 'alternative way of life' has stood the test of time, and how it will be thought of by the people that live in the world of tomorrow'...

so, for all those ppl that want to 'destroy the world as we know it'... go ahead
you seem to think there is something wrong with it, and obviously have the passion to rectify the issue, so you should be allowed your chance to convince others over to your ideology...

as for me, i will just keep doing what i do without a care in the world...

(hmm... after such a philosophical piece i would just like to add that i am not in the running for world domination in a political sense... if i was to take over the world then i would use more fun methods to coerce ppl into 'being that change for the future'... how you are wondering??? just wait and see, i promise it will be an enjoyable experience for both you and me :-p...)

(and lastly for ppl living in europe, think of what the 'european union' means... and you don't realise it but changes take place too, just little by little so that they go unnoticed...)

燕燕